Nope, not in the
least. Its the busiest time of the
season as all the preparations for
the next season and
our clerical work begins. Thank the lord
for some great staffers that we have who
contribute invaluably to the league
I preside over, the CBA. With our World Series
now over and completed, there are
new priorities that get
set along with updating all of our
league stats and new analysts which take over.
To illustrate the tasks that need to
be done at this time of year I will
use my own league as an example
which of course I am very familiar
with with,
Now, I'm sure each league has
their own talented support staff. In
the CBA, Doug
Brunet provides for us an amazing
spreadsheet par excellence for our
roster management which is an
invaluable tool for every manager.
This spreadsheet not only show the
current team's roster but all the
players who are available for our
next draft with each players stats
for the last playing year. In
addition, Doug does a great job of tracking
the usage of the players in the CBA
and he even gets down into
great detail on this. For example, last season
Doug even tracked
each time a player was demoted and recalled
for each team. We have additional invaluable support
that comes from
a number of other league volunteers
as well. I can't tell you
how much I appreciate the efforts of
this team as I don't believe any
league can have all of these tasks
to support and be run well by just
one person.
Now, let's take a look behind the
scenes. Well, last month, upon the
completion of our league playoffs, I
managed to update the website
by sharing for each playoff series
its box scores and
the press releases from teams
involved along with the ones from
our league
offices. After setting up these webpages, I absolutely HAD to merge
the last season's data from the regular
season along with our playoffs into our
leagues voluminous 'Encyclopedia".
Our league encyclopedia has the full data
all from all of our seasons all the
way back to 1997. We have just about all
the data too from all the playoff
series as well. Look take a look at some of
these stats. I know that you will just love 'em!
Derek Jeter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Batting Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team |
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
BB |
IBB |
SO |
SH |
SF |
HBP |
GIDP |
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
1997 Phantastics |
28 |
104 |
15 |
27 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
13 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0.260 |
0.347 |
0.346 |
1997 Canonballs |
160 |
659 |
80 |
171 |
23 |
3 |
9 |
43 |
50 |
7 |
112 |
25 |
2 |
7 |
16 |
0.259 |
0.318 |
0.344 |
1998 Phantastics |
162 |
658 |
96 |
177 |
28 |
5 |
11 |
93 |
64 |
0 |
129 |
30 |
4 |
17 |
17 |
0.269 |
0.347 |
0.377 |
1999 Phantastics |
89 |
357 |
82 |
130 |
17 |
8 |
18 |
63 |
38 |
2 |
54 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
9 |
0.364 |
0.437 |
0.608 |
1999 Breakers |
56 |
205 |
26 |
65 |
8 |
2 |
6 |
19 |
27 |
5 |
52 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
0.317 |
0.402 |
0.463 |
2000 Phantastics |
162 |
673 |
158 |
249 |
35 |
10 |
32 |
133 |
90 |
1 |
121 |
5 |
4 |
12 |
11 |
0.370 |
0.451 |
0.594 |
2001 Phantastics |
162 |
702 |
127 |
239 |
38 |
4 |
19 |
89 |
68 |
0 |
122 |
9 |
3 |
13 |
15 |
0.340 |
0.407 |
0.487 |
2002 Phantastics |
162 |
729 |
147 |
227 |
39 |
0 |
21 |
81 |
51 |
0 |
112 |
16 |
10 |
10 |
13 |
0.311 |
0.360 |
0.451 |
2003 Phantastics |
158 |
672 |
151 |
191 |
34 |
0 |
15 |
87 |
80 |
2 |
117 |
16 |
7 |
6 |
15 |
0.284 |
0.362 |
0.402 |
2004 Phantastics |
126 |
440 |
60 |
131 |
17 |
3 |
12 |
65 |
33 |
1 |
78 |
12 |
3 |
12 |
6 |
0.298 |
0.361 |
0.432 |
2005 Phantastics |
146 |
630 |
127 |
197 |
52 |
2 |
22 |
87 |
42 |
1 |
117 |
12 |
5 |
16 |
20 |
0.313 |
0.368 |
0.506 |
2006 Phantastics |
157 |
636 |
113 |
188 |
28 |
4 |
19 |
78 |
71 |
1 |
125 |
12 |
2 |
15 |
12 |
0.296 |
0.378 |
0.442 |
2007 Phantastics |
156 |
612 |
121 |
195 |
28 |
4 |
15 |
71 |
81 |
16 |
111 |
29 |
5 |
7 |
16 |
0.319 |
0.401 |
0.451 |
2008 Phantastics |
155 |
635 |
79 |
177 |
38 |
3 |
7 |
54 |
49 |
5 |
104 |
11 |
4 |
10 |
16 |
0.279 |
0.338 |
0.381 |
2009 Phantastics |
149 |
616 |
122 |
198 |
22 |
3 |
12 |
85 |
53 |
6 |
96 |
16 |
4 |
6 |
28 |
0.321 |
0.378 |
0.425 |
2010 Phantastics |
162 |
659 |
108 |
205 |
32 |
1 |
17 |
69 |
56 |
1 |
91 |
28 |
1 |
6 |
21 |
0.311 |
0.370 |
0.440 |
2011 Phantastics |
98 |
390 |
63 |
108 |
16 |
6 |
6 |
42 |
33 |
0 |
70 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
0.277 |
0.344 |
0.395 |
2011 Superbas |
19 |
73 |
8 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0.192 |
0.272 |
0.219 |
2012 Superbas |
146 |
552 |
89 |
169 |
18 |
7 |
4 |
31 |
49 |
8 |
87 |
7 |
2 |
7 |
9 |
0.306 |
0.369 |
0.386 |
2013 Superbas |
159 |
676 |
122 |
218 |
39 |
1 |
20 |
96 |
47 |
4 |
97 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
18 |
0.322 |
0.368 |
0.472 |
2014 Wolfmen |
17 |
60 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.083 |
0.141 |
0.100 |
Career Totals |
2629 |
10738 |
1896 |
3281 |
515 |
69 |
266 |
1298 |
1005 |
61 |
1827 |
239 |
60 |
168 |
265 |
0.306 |
0.372 |
0.441 |
Alex Rodriguez |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Batting Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team |
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
BB |
IBB |
SO |
SH |
SF |
HBP |
GIDP |
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
1997 Harbour |
107 |
425 |
79 |
144 |
29 |
1 |
29 |
91 |
51 |
13 |
73 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
10 |
0.339 |
0.408 |
0.616 |
1997 Wild Cats |
51 |
181 |
31 |
66 |
20 |
0 |
9 |
22 |
15 |
5 |
41 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
0.365 |
0.416 |
0.624 |
1998 GeoDucks |
162 |
661 |
116 |
208 |
53 |
1 |
30 |
94 |
64 |
7 |
126 |
4 |
3 |
8 |
12 |
0.315 |
0.380 |
0.534 |
1999 Phantastics |
57 |
233 |
42 |
61 |
9 |
3 |
13 |
42 |
27 |
10 |
45 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
0.262 |
0.346 |
0.494 |
1999 Breakers |
106 |
426 |
60 |
107 |
13 |
0 |
22 |
63 |
36 |
11 |
81 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
12 |
0.251 |
0.319 |
0.437 |
2000 Capitale |
162 |
661 |
105 |
174 |
33 |
0 |
47 |
131 |
57 |
1 |
156 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
16 |
0.263 |
0.323 |
0.526 |
2001 Capitale |
162 |
616 |
156 |
197 |
40 |
2 |
55 |
158 |
127 |
2 |
162 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
16 |
0.320 |
0.440 |
0.659 |
2002 Capitale |
162 |
640 |
127 |
201 |
33 |
1 |
55 |
139 |
73 |
17 |
146 |
0 |
8 |
10 |
25 |
0.314 |
0.389 |
0.627 |
2003 Capitale |
162 |
642 |
133 |
196 |
27 |
2 |
54 |
161 |
88 |
6 |
136 |
1 |
8 |
10 |
24 |
0.305 |
0.393 |
0.606 |
2004 Aeros |
162 |
618 |
126 |
181 |
33 |
1 |
49 |
125 |
76 |
1 |
142 |
0 |
5 |
25 |
16 |
0.293 |
0.390 |
0.587 |
2005 Aeros |
149 |
594 |
110 |
165 |
18 |
4 |
45 |
127 |
71 |
1 |
131 |
0 |
7 |
9 |
19 |
0.278 |
0.360 |
0.549 |
2006 Redbirds |
158 |
598 |
145 |
186 |
11 |
2 |
58 |
141 |
88 |
4 |
133 |
0 |
9 |
11 |
12 |
0.311 |
0.404 |
0.627 |
2007 Redbirds |
160 |
600 |
109 |
181 |
29 |
2 |
45 |
130 |
71 |
0 |
143 |
0 |
11 |
11 |
15 |
0.302 |
0.380 |
0.582 |
2008 Redbirds |
155 |
589 |
124 |
173 |
30 |
1 |
42 |
104 |
75 |
2 |
144 |
0 |
6 |
25 |
21 |
0.294 |
0.393 |
0.562 |
2009 Redbirds |
145 |
525 |
106 |
164 |
36 |
1 |
45 |
117 |
61 |
2 |
126 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
16 |
0.312 |
0.398 |
0.642 |
2010 Redbirds |
131 |
470 |
75 |
123 |
24 |
1 |
24 |
81 |
75 |
2 |
101 |
0 |
6 |
10 |
8 |
0.262 |
0.371 |
0.470 |
2011 Redbirds |
134 |
505 |
67 |
135 |
35 |
2 |
18 |
76 |
53 |
4 |
93 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
13 |
0.267 |
0.337 |
0.451 |
2012 Redbirds |
106 |
367 |
53 |
92 |
19 |
0 |
15 |
51 |
52 |
1 |
82 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
8 |
0.251 |
0.353 |
0.425 |
2013 Redbirds |
111 |
380 |
67 |
114 |
16 |
1 |
19 |
50 |
52 |
0 |
89 |
1 |
0 |
11 |
13 |
0.300 |
0.400 |
0.497 |
2014 Iron Horses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
2014 Redbirds |
56 |
140 |
20 |
40 |
11 |
0 |
8 |
20 |
11 |
0 |
44 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0.286 |
0.338 |
0.536 |
Career Totals |
2598 |
9871 |
1851 |
2908 |
519 |
25 |
682 |
1923 |
1223 |
89 |
2194 |
8 |
85 |
179 |
272 |
0.295 |
0.379 |
0.560 |
The next task at hand is to post the
League Stats
and Encyclopedia information to our
website along with a few graphic
charts as well. Please see below a
sample of a few of these charts from
our 2013 season:
Our next order of
business is sorting through the
penalties committed by each team
during the last year and making an assessment of
the infractions. I am strictly
guided on this by our constitution and often
I have to mete
out the loss of picks to teams who
have committed too many infractions or
even sometimes, unfortunately must
terminate a
GM for dereliction of his duties
during the season. No doubt this is
the worst
part of the experience for a GM considering
how much time and effort these gamers/friends put
into their long season. I am
even sure these GM may be grumbling behind my back,
but a strong league has to enforce these
penalties to the letter, in my
opinion, to keep your league running
smoothly.
I even
had to assess myself a lost draft pick last
season after I inadvertently allowed
two players to exceed their player's usage, and
didn't
meet the minimum Plate appearance to
appear as a starter in a week
(block) of games. This action by our
league office is never popular but
it is necessary. The harmony and balance
of our league requires that usage
stays at an even 100%. It's my
fundamental belief that usage
promotes what strategies each team
must take and that even 1 at
bat can influence a pennant race as
well as change the fortunes of your
friends.. We owe it to each other to
be diligent. Sportsmanship as we
accord to each other as is expounded
by our founding charter.
With the penalty
assessment out of the
way, then working and updating the
CBA website takes a major
portion of my time as this past season
has to be archived and linked in as new pages
are setup and updated for each
new season. These updates include
season won-lost record along with playoff links
and data and new pictures or team logos.
I also add the
final yearbook created from the game
that includes pictures of our GMS
along with some personal photos.
The team historic
pages will also receive new entries and highlights.
Each team's pages gets linked to their
custom team logo on our website's
main page. (A note to myself, buy a
better html editor.) The web,
twitter, facebook all get updates made and then the announcement
of our new champion. This year, Glen Kenan's
Ohio Outlawz destroyed the
competition enroute to the
17th CBA Championship. I promptly
ordered an engraved trophy from a
reputable local trophy specialist, and
sent it on to Glenn. This award couldn't have gone
to a better or nicer person as one
of our GMs. Glenn has paid his
dues for 10 seasons before taking
this baby home. His picture is posted
with the championship trophy on our
website (check it out or any of the
other comments shared in this
article by visiting our site at:
http://www.cba-bb.net).
This
is the best part of the Commish's
role acknowledging our current
champion. He said he was absolutely thrilled
and so were we!
As Doug, our "Roster
Guy" puts together the latest
version of another excellent
league spreadsheet which includes the latest trades
and the draft grid for 2015, I have
to focus upon some personnel decisions
to help our league move forward,
which is my duties as the "Commish". Unfortunately,
after going
from the highs of sending our new
champion his trophy,
I now come to the lows of dismissing
a few GM's who had to or needed to
move on. Again, we have to follow
the laws of our
constitution and dismissal, at times is a
reality in such a competitive
league. When GM's do not follow
procedures, and run into excessive
infractions as spelled out by our
constitution, for the good of our
league they will be
dismissed. There are mitigations for
derelictions of GM duties
such as an obvious health challenge, death
in the family or some type of
personal
tragedy which are certainly
accounted for of course ... but
normal E mail contact should occur regularly,
Yes?
During this past
season, we had a GM incur 7 over-usage
infractions at season's end which
affected a pennant race. Retirement
was in order and fortunately was mutually respected.
It is not an easy decision to let someone
go as good friendships are always affected.
However, for Commissioners who are wise,
they must respect these type of
situations and know at times problems
come -- "Think
first several times" :)
Then finding good
replacements is a process on its own for some
leagues with its own challenges. The CBA is fortunate enough to
have a very low turnover as I
believe our GMs feel very close to
each other like family. When we do
need a
replacement GM, they are found from
within our organization. Often respected
GM's will nominate a person whom we
can reference, or has built a
reputation to invite as a
replacement. On occasion, we will
even welcome a less experienced GM
because we know he (or she) will be a good fit and is
very reliable. I generally make the final
decision who to invite and welcome
to the CBA. There are various candidates who I am
personally acquainted with
that I think can fill the bill who I
will talk to as well. I also
strongly recommend to take
advantage of the Strat-o-matic's
website too and to place a league opening
on the appropriate section.
The guys at SOM are great about
allowing such notices and they put
it up quite quickly.
Getting new GM's
acquainted with the rules of your
league and how interactions between
members happen is quite important.
As you just
know, that existing teams will inundate the
new member and go like wolves after
rabbit dinner especially to make
trades or get players they covet. Salivating like
Pablo's dogs, ruminating at a chance
to get at a Mike Trout, Jacob DeGrom,
and Jorge Soler as an example. "Perhaps, I can
send you Silvio Martinez an
establish winning (mind you) Righty
starter, Paul Popovich and upcoming
middle infielder, Mark Bomback a
lefty, Lee Stanton a power hitter,
and Luis Gomez a real.....upcoming
young prospect for ...." Well ok I I need to
build" is the usual reply back
and after this, the new GM's
team fades and he loses
interest in his stocked team becomes
a dead franchise. I'm all for the
trade committee aka 'Tradecom' (as
we call it) to
protect these new franchises. They may watch
over a new GM who we put in a
probationary mode for their 1st
season as well as be
watching for logistics like usage
allowances and over usage along with
having eligible players and proper draft
pick exchanges for lastly, good trade
balance. Stop back up here, "Trade
balance"? Yes that's correct, we
have to look out for lopsided trades.
This can bring up a
huge debate within "Tradecom" but
there is an easy answer to this.
Yes, if "Tradecom"
sees an imbalanced
trade, they will ask the trade
partners to re-work this trade. Here
are the conditions we look when
trades are announced by our league
members: